MRI-based Prostate Radiation Therapy
2026-01-24https://doi.org/10.1148/atlas.1769278164543
132
Overview
Schema Version
https://atlas.rsna.org/schemas/2025-11/dataset.json
Name
MRI-based Prostate Radiation Therapy
Link
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8980936/
Indexing
Keywords: MRI, Neural Networks, Radiation Therapy, Prostate, Segmentation, Dosimetry, Low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy, External urinary sphincter, Hydrogel rectal spacer
Content: GU, MR, RO
RadLex: RID39262, RID49531, RID22338, RID49590, RID12781, RID38870, RID16573, RID22286
Author(s)
Jeremiah W. Sanders
Rajat J. Kudchadker
Chad Tang
Henry Mok
Aradhana M. Venkatesan
Howard D. Thames
Steven J. Frank
Organization(s)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
License
Text: © RSNA, 2022 (article).
Contact
Corresponding author: Jeremiah W. Sanders (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant and institutional review board–approved study at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Ethical review
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant and institutional review board–approved protocol at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Date
Published: 2022-01-26
References
[1] Sanders JW, Kudchadker RJ, Tang C, Mok H, Venkatesan AM, Thames HD, Frank SJ. "Prospective Evaluation of Prostate and Organs at Risk Segmentation Software for MRI-based Prostate Radiation Therapy". Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2022-03-01. doi:10.1148/ryai.210151. PMID: 35391775. PMCID: PMC8980936.
Dataset
Motivation
Assess clinical performance of fully convolutional network–based automatic segmentation for prostate and organs at risk on postimplant MRI for LDRPBT using clinically relevant dosimetry metrics.
Sampling
Thirty consecutive patients with confirmed prostate cancer undergoing MRI-based LDRPBT between February and June 2021 at a single institution.
Partitioning scheme
No machine learning train/validation/test partitioning within this study; comparisons made between automatic and physician-refined contours and between patient-specific and fixed operating points.
Missing information
No public data repository or file formats specified; imaging resolution and file formats not reported.
Relationships between instances
For each patient, multiple organ segmentations (prostate, external urinary sphincter, seminal vesicles, rectum, bladder) were derived from a postimplant MRI examination; dosimetry computed from the same seed plan for automatic and physician-refined contours.
Noise
Presence of implanted radioactive seeds and, in 23% of patients, biodegradable hydrogel rectal spacers; images acquired with different MRI sequences (turbo spin-echo or fully balanced SSFP).
External data
Development of the DL model referenced 295 MRI scans; the present prospective evaluation used 30 consecutive patients imaged postimplant at the same institution.
Confidentiality
Patient MRI examinations from a single institution; HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved.
Sensitive data
Clinical imaging of cancer patients; PHI handling governed by HIPAA and IRB approval.