Automated Inline Myocardial Segmentation of Joint T1 and T2 Mapping Using Deep Learning (mSASHA CMR dataset)
2026-01-24https://doi.org/10.1148/atlas.1769272178092
61
Overview
Schema Version
https://atlas.rsna.org/schemas/2025-11/dataset.json
Name
Automated Inline Myocardial Segmentation of Joint T1 and T2 Mapping Using Deep Learning (mSASHA CMR dataset)
Link
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9885378/
Indexing
Keywords: myocardial segmentation, cardiac MRI, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, mSASHA, deep learning, inline analysis, Siemens Aera 1.5T
Content: CA, MR
RadLex: RID35976, RID10312
Author(s)
James P. Howard
Kelvin Chow
Liza Chacko
Mariana Fontana
Graham D. Cole
Peter Kellman
Hui Xue
Organization(s)
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London
National Amyloidosis Centre, UCL
Siemens Medical Solutions USA
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH
Funding
British Heart Foundation (FS/ICRF/22/26039); NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. Funders had no role in study design, analysis, or manuscript drafting.
Ethical review
Ethical approval granted by the UK Health Research Authority (IRAS 243023); written informed consent waived due to use of fully de-identified patient data.
Comments
Retrospective study of joint cardiac MR T1/T2 mapping (mSASHA) across two London hospitals with expert-labeled endocardial and epicardial contours used to train and test a CNN for automated segmentation and segment-wise mapping.
Date
Published: 2022-11-09
Created: 2020-03-01
References
[1] Howard JP, Chow K, Chacko L, Fontana M, Cole GD, Kellman P, Xue H. "Automated Inline Myocardial Segmentation of Joint T1 and T2 Mapping Using Deep Learning". Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2023-01-01. doi:10.1148/ryai.220050. PMID: 36721410. PMCID: PMC9885378.
Dataset
Motivation
Develop and validate an AI method for automated segmentation and segment-wise analysis of jointly acquired cardiac T1 and T2 maps, enabling inline clinical deployment.
Sampling
Consecutive adult patients undergoing CMR at two tertiary centers in London between March and November 2020.
Partitioning scheme
Consecutive adult patients from two hospitals; images from the final 3 weeks assigned to a holdout testing set. Training/validation used earlier images.
Missing information
Patient-level baseline characteristics not available under ethical restrictions.
Relationships between instances
Multiple short-axis sections (basal, mid, apical) per patient; maps acquired pre- and post-contrast when clinically indicated; multiple maps per patient.
Noise
Imaging artifacts present; 280/3426 training-assigned maps and 30/509 testing-assigned maps excluded due to artifacts; motion correction inherent to mSASHA sequence.
External data
None reported.
Confidentiality
Fully de-identified patient imaging data; consent waived.
Re-identification
Data were fully de-identified prior to analysis; low re-identification risk.
Sensitive data
Medical imaging data of cardiac patients; de-identified before analysis.