CT-based Osteoporosis Assessment study dataset
2026-01-24https://doi.org/10.1148/atlas.1769273981068
101
Overview
Schema Version
https://atlas.rsna.org/schemas/2025-11/dataset.json
Name
CT-based Osteoporosis Assessment study dataset
Link
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9530763/
Indexing
Keywords: opportunistic screening, bone mineral density, L1 vertebra, trabecular attenuation, Hounsfield units, deep learning, abdominal CT, osteoporosis assessment
Content: CT, GI, MK, BQ
RadLex: RID29193, RID7480, RID5389, RID28662, RID10363, RID10321, RID39161, RID12719
SNOMED: 64859006
Author(s)
Perry J. Pickhardt
Thang Nguyen
Alberto A. Perez
Peter M. Graffy
Samuel Jang
Ronald M. Summers
John W. Garrett
Organization(s)
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health
Imaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Funding
Authors declared no funding for this work (study-specific).
Ethical review
IRB approved; HIPAA-compliant; informed consent waived.
Comments
Single-center, retrospective study using abdominal CT scans with manual L1 trabecular attenuation as reference standard; development, testing, and validation of a DL tool against a prior feature-based algorithm.
Date
Published: 2022-08-31
References
[1] Pickhardt PJ, Nguyen T, Perez AA, Graffy PM, Jang S, Summers RM, Garrett JW. "Improved CT-based Osteoporosis Assessment with a Fully Automated Deep Learning Tool". Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2022-09-01. doi:10.1148/ryai.220042. PMID: 36204542. PMCID: PMC9530763.
Dataset
Motivation
Develop, test, and validate a DL tool for automated CT-based BMD assessment and compare with manual reference and a prior feature-based algorithm.
Sampling
All abdominal CT studies from PACS over long period without focused selection to mirror opportunistic approach; noncontrast preferentially selected for manual reference, but contrast-enhanced exams included.
Partitioning scheme
DL model training/validation on image pairs from multiple vertebral levels; independent test on separate single-scan-per-patient cohort.
Missing information
No public release details or de-identification protocol reported.
Relationships between instances
Multiple axial slices per study; training used multiple vertebral levels (approximately 1.7 ROIs per case).
Noise
Heterogeneous clinical CT protocols (kVp mostly 120; varying mA, IV/oral contrast phases, slice thickness, kernels).
Confidentiality
Retrospective single-center PACS data; HIPAA-compliant.
Sensitive data
Clinical CT images from human subjects.