Two-Stage Training Framework Using Multicontrast MRI Radiomics for IDH Mutation Status Prediction in Glioma
2025-11-26https://doi.org/10.1148/atlas.1764158783246
21
Overview
Schema Version
https://atlas.rsna.org/schemas/2025-11/model.json
Name
Two-Stage Training Framework Using Multicontrast MRI Radiomics for IDH Mutation Status Prediction in Glioma
Link
https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230218
Indexing
Keywords: Glioma, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation, IDH Mutation, Radiomics, MRI
Content: MR, NR, OI
RadLex: RID5683
SNOMED: 115240006, 393564001
Author(s)
Nghi C. D. Truong
Chandan Ganesh Bangalore Yogananda
Benjamin C. Wagner
James M. Holcomb
Divya Reddy
Niloufar Saadat
Kimmo J. Hatanpaa
Toral R. Patel
Baowei Fei
Matthew D. Lee
Rajan Jain
Richard J. Bruce
Marco C. Pinho
Ananth J. Madhuranthakam
Joseph A. Maldjian
Organization(s)
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
The University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Bioengineering
New York University Grossman School of Medicine, Departments of Radiology and Neurosurgery
University of Wisconsin–Madison, Department of Radiology
Version
1.0
License
Text: CC BY 4.0
URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Contact
ude.nretsewhtuostu@gnourT.ihgN
Funding
A.J.M. and J.A.M. supported by NIH/NCI U01CA207091; J.A.M. supported by R01CA260705; R.J.B. supported by NIH 1R01LM013151-01A1.
Ethical review
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained at UTSW with a waiver of consent for the use of retrospective data or public datasets; study was HIPAA compliant.
Date
Published: 2024-05-22
Created: 2023-06-26
References
[1] Truong NCD, Bangalore Yogananda CG, Wagner BC, Holcomb JM, Reddy D, Saadat N, Hatanpaa KJ, Patel TR, Fei B, Lee MD, Jain R, Bruce RJ, Pinho MC, Madhuranthakam AJ, Maldjian JA. "Two-Stage Training Framework Using Multicontrast MRI Radiomics for IDH Mutation Status Prediction in Glioma". Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2024 Jul;6(4):e230218.. 2024-05-22. doi:10.1148/ryai.230218. PMID: 38775670. PMCID: PMC11294953.
Model
Architecture
Radiomics-based machine learning with Boruta feature selection and ensemble classifiers (Random Forest and XGBoost) trained via a two-stage balanced-subset framework with probability ensembling.
Availability
Not stated.
Clinical benefit
Noninvasive preoperative prediction of IDH mutation status in glioma, a key prognostic marker that can inform treatment selection and risk stratification.
Clinical workflow phase
Preoperative assessment and clinical decision support.
Degree of automation
Automated pipeline for preprocessing and tumor segmentation (FeTS or other tools), automated radiomics extraction (PyRadiomics), and automated classification; intended as decision support.
Indications for use
Patients with newly diagnosed glioma with available preoperative multicontrast brain MRI (T1w, postcontrast T1w, T2w, T2-FLAIR) and tumor segmentation; prediction of IDH mutation status.
Input
Preoperative multicontrast brain MRI (T1-weighted, postcontrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2-FLAIR) and tumor segmentation masks for whole tumor and/or combined NET+NCR+ED regions; 1197 radiomic features per ROI per sequence extracted with PyRadiomics.
Instructions
Preprocess MRI to 1×1×1 mm3, bias-correct, skull-strip, and coregister; generate tumor masks (WT and NET+NCR+ED where available); extract radiomics features (original and filtered images) with PyRadiomics; apply Boruta feature selection on multiple balanced subsets; train Random Forest or XGBoost classifiers on each subset; ensemble models by averaging predicted probabilities to obtain final IDH mutation prediction.
Limitations
Requires accurate tumor segmentation; variability across datasets in preprocessing and labeling of subregions; training data are imbalanced (overall ~27% IDH-mutated) and addressed via two-stage balanced-subset training; EGD dataset provided only WT masks; no statistical significance testing; performance may depend on MRI acquisition and segmentation quality.
Output
CDEs: RDE748, RDE748.2
Description: Binary classification: predicted IDH mutation status (mutated vs wild type) with associated probability.
Recommendation
Features from combined ROIs (WT and NET+NCR+ED) and the two-stage balanced-subset training/ensembling strategy yielded the most robust performance across external cohorts.
Reproducibility
Model parameters for Boruta and classifiers provided in Supplemental Table S5; PyRadiomics settings and feature lists provided in Supplemental Tables S3–S4; evaluated across multiple independent external datasets with varying acquisition and segmentation approaches.
Use
Intended: Decision support