RSNA Cervical Spine Fracture Detection (RSNA-CSF) Dataset
The RSNA Cervical Spine Fracture Detection (RSNA-CSF) Dataset is the largest publicly available, multi-institutional and multinational expert-labeled dataset of cervical spine fracture CT images for AI research. Used in the RSNA 2022 AI Challenge. Includes patient-level, vertebra-level, bounding box, and segmentation annotations. Data from 12 institutions across nine countries and six continents. The dataset included 3112 CT scans.
dataset2025-11-21https://doi.org/10.1148/atlas.1763423842449
113

Overview

Schema Version

https://atlas.rsna.org/schemas/2025-11/dataset.json

Name

RSNA Cervical Spine Fracture Detection (RSNA-CSF) Dataset

Link

https://mira.rsna.org/dataset/4

Indexing

Keywords: CT, Head/Neck, Cervical Spine, Fracture, Segmentation
Content: CT, HN, MK, NR
RadLex: RID28674, RID4650

Author(s)

Hui Ming Lin
Errol Colak
Tyler Richards
Felipe C. Kitamura
Luciano M. Prevedello
Jason Talbott
Robyn L. Ball
Ekim Gumeler
Kristen W. Yeom
Mohammad Hamghalam
Amber L. Simpson
Jasna Strika
Deniz Bulja
Salita Angkurawaranon
Almudena Pérez-Lara
María Isabel Gómez-Alonso
Johanna Ortiz Jiménez
Jacob J. Peoples
Meng Law
Hakan Dogan
Emre Altinmakas
Ayda Youssef
Yasser Mahfouz
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Adam E. Flanders

Organization(s)

Radiological Society of North America
American Society of Neuroradiology
American Society of Spine Radiology

Version

1.0

License

Text: RSNA MIRA DATASET RESEARCH USE AGREEMENT
URL: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r8_0yW-5XqxSqhFzFq2fV6L4NxIQ6drF0sBjXXJevXU/edit?tab=t.0

Contact

informatics@rsna.org

Comments

Largest publicly available, multi-institutional and multinational expert-labeled dataset of cervical spine fracture CT images for AI research. Used in the RSNA 2022 AI Challenge. Includes patient-level, vertebra-level, bounding box, and segmentation annotations. Data from 12 institutions across nine countries and six continents. The dataset included 3112 CT scans; 1445 studies positive for fracture (954 men, 491 women; mean age, 56.78 years ± 21.97), supplemented with 1667 studies negative for fracture (1022 men, 645 women; mean age, 50.61 years ± 21.29).

Date

Created: 2022-07-28

Dataset

Motivation

Cervical spine injuries are a common form of traumatic injury, affecting more than 3 million patients per year in North America. Cervical fractures can lead to substantial disability. There is a need for fast and accurate diagnosis, providing an excellent clinical use case for AI algorithms. The lack of publicly available, expertly annotated cervical spine fracture datasets hinders further improvements in model performance.

Sampling

Curated and created expert annotation of a large high-quality cervical spine fracture CT dataset from 12 institutions from six different continents. Unconventional annotation methods by means of prelabeling were used, with labels provided by contributing sites. Hybrid schema chosen: study-level annotation detailing each cervical spine level fractured or no fracture in control dataset. Smaller subset (approx. 16% of positive fracture cases) assigned image-level annotations, including bounding boxes. Additional subset of cases containing segmentation masks of the vertebrae.

Partitioning scheme

Data distribution used for the Kaggle competition, with 2019 cases in the training set, 304 cases in the public test set, and 789 cases in the private test set. Great care was also taken to ensure that data were distributed equally with respect to sex, age, contributing site, and fracture level across the training, validation, and test sets.

Missing information

The strict inclusion criteria of axial noncontrast 1-mm-thick section images may limit its application to practices that have different section acquisitions or reformat their CT cervical spine scans from a postcontrast acquisition. The dataset treats acute and chronic fractures the same. This dataset excluded patients who underwent prior surgery because of the challenges of streak artifacts and altered anatomy. Some fractures were visualized that were not accounted for in the radiologist’s report, with the radiologist’s report chosen as ground truth.

Relationships between instances

A single study may contain multiple fractures.

Noise

Images are commonly confounded by superimposed degenerative disease and osteoporosis, making fracture detection more complex.