Federated nnU-Net for tumor segmentation (FILTS and FeTS study)
2026-01-24https://doi.org/10.1148/atlas.1769269854904
30
Overview
Schema Version
https://atlas.rsna.org/schemas/2025-11/model.json
Name
Federated nnU-Net for tumor segmentation (FILTS and FeTS study)
Link
https://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220082
Indexing
Keywords: Federated deep learning, nnU-Net, Tumor segmentation, CT, MRI, Liver, Brain, Glioma, Earth mover’s distance, Bhattacharyya distance, Chi-square distance, Kolmogorov–Smirnov distance, Data distribution, Non-IID data
Content: CT, MR, GI, NR, OI, IN, RS
RadLex: RID11085, RID39127, RID10782, RID10321, RID6189, RID16585
SNOMED: 25370001, 1156974002, 443936004, 1163375002, 278527001, 1157043006, 85057007, 109841003, 1260050006
Author(s)
Guibo Luo
Tianyu Liu
Jinghui Lu
Xin Chen
Lequan Yu
Jian Wu
Danny Z. Chen
Wenli Cai
Organization(s)
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
Intel Corporation
Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong
College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Notre Dame
Version
1.0
License
Text: © 2023 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
URL: https://pubs.rsna.org/journal/ai
Contact
ude.dravrah.hgm@ilneW.iaC
Funding
Supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (grant no. R42CA189637) and the Children’s Tumor Foundation (grant no. CTF-2021-10-02).
Ethical review
Retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study approved by the institutional review board; need for patient informed consent was waived.
Date
Updated: 2023-05-01
Published: 2023-04-26
Created: 2022-04-26
References
[1] Luo G, Liu T, Lu J, Chen X, Yu L, Wu J, Chen DZ, Cai W. "Influence of Data Distribution on Federated Learning Performance in Tumor Segmentation". Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2023-05-01. doi:10.1148/ryai.220082. PMID: 37293342. PMCID: PMC10245185.
Model
Architecture
Federated implementation of nnU-Net (3D U-Net pipeline) using server–client topology and Fed-Avg aggregation.
Availability
The data and scripts used to perform study evaluations will be made publicly available (per Data Availability statement).
Clinical benefit
Research evaluation of federated deep learning for tumor segmentation; insights into effects of inter-site data distribution differences.
Clinical workflow phase
Research and algorithm development; benchmarking of federated learning on multicenter datasets.
Degree of automation
Automated image segmentation model training and inference within a federated learning framework; decision support not intended for clinical use.
Indications for use
Research-only: segmentation of liver tumors on contrast-enhanced CT and brain tumors (glioma/glioblastoma; enhancing and nonenhancing regions) on postcontrast T1-weighted MRI in a federated learning setting.
Input
CT images of liver (contrast-enhanced; arterial/portal venous/delayed) and postcontrast T1-weighted brain MRI (plus FeTS preprocessing: coregistration, resampling to 1×1×1 mm, skull stripping).
Instructions
Run nnU-Net planning/preprocessing (3D pipeline) uniformly; train federated and centralized models with identical preprocessed data and hyperparameters. Federated setup: one server and two clients (each with one subdataset). 80:20 train/test split within each group. Trained on NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPUs (24 GB).
Limitations
Site A (LiTS) is a multisite dataset; sites B and C are single-site—protocol heterogeneity may affect findings. Tumor type not reported for sites A and B. Potential interreader variability across institutions and software. Results specific to Fed-Avg and server–client topology; not all Fed-DL algorithms assessed.
Output
CDEs: RDE2038, RDE1401, RDE1956, RDE1400, RDE1402, RDE1404
Description: Voxelwise tumor segmentation masks; evaluation reports include Dice and θ (federated-to-centralized Dice ratio).
Recommendation
To achieve federated performance comparable to centralized training, use client datasets with small inter-site distribution distances; consider data augmentation/domain adaptation to reduce distances (e.g., as measured by EMD, BD, CSD).
Regulatory information
Comment: No regulatory clearance; methodological research on federated learning.
Authorization status: Research study; not a regulated medical device.
Reproducibility
Same preprocessing and hyperparameters used for federated and centralized models; random 80/20 splits within each group; θ reported as mean ± SE (SE via bivariate first-order Taylor expansion).
Sustainability
Training performed on NVIDIA Tesla P40 GPUs (24 GB). Computational/energy metrics not reported.
Use
Intended: Image segmentation
Out-of-scope: Diagnosis
Excluded: Decision support
User
Intended: Researcher
Out-of-scope: Patient
Excluded: Subspecialist diagnostic radiologist