UT Southwestern cohort for Kidney Segmentation at Multiphase MRI
2025-12-03https://doi.org/10.1148/atlas.1764793042342
32
Overview
Schema Version
https://atlas.rsna.org/schemas/2025-11/dataset.json
Name
UT Southwestern cohort for Kidney Segmentation at Multiphase MRI
Link
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230043
Indexing
Keywords: Kidney segmentation, CycleGAN, Generative adversarial network, Mask R-CNN, Multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI, T2-weighted MRI, Style transfer, Semisupervised learning
Content: GU, MR, IN
RadLex: RID49531
SNOMED: 309088003
Author(s)
Junyu Guo, PhD
Manu Goyal, PhD
Yin Xi, PhD
Lauren Hinojosa, MD
Gaelle Haddad, MD
Emin Albayrak, MD
Ivan Pedrosa, MD, PhD
Organization(s)
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
License
Text: Article published under CC BY 4.0; study data available from corresponding author by request.
URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Contact
Corresponding author: Ivan Pedrosa, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Funding
Partially funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01CA154475). Computational resources provided by the BioHPC supercomputing facility, Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, UT Southwestern Medical Center.
Ethical review
Institutional review board–approved; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant; informed consent waived.
Comments
Retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved study of patients with renal masses imaged with T2-weighted and multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI; style transfer (CycleGAN) used to synthesize multiphase images for training kidney segmentation (Mask R-CNN). Data sharing: available from corresponding author by request.
Date
Published: 2023-09-13
References
[1] Guo J, Goyal M, Xi Y, Hinojosa L, Haddad G, Albayrak E, Pedrosa I. "Style Transfer–assisted Deep Learning Method for Kidney Segmentation at Multiphase MRI". Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2023. doi:10.1148/ryai.230043. PMID: 38074795. PMCID: PMC10698598.
Dataset
Motivation
Enable automated kidney segmentation across multiple dynamic MRI phases without manual annotation of each phase, mitigating misregistration challenges and annotation burden.
Sampling
Patients with known renal masses imaged at UT Southwestern (and some outside institutions for cohort 1) during 2011–2015 (cohort 1) and 2016–2019 (cohort 2).
Partitioning scheme
Cohort 1: 102 coronal T2-weighted acquisitions and 27 corticomedullary-phase acquisitions. CycleGAN Cmodel1 trained using 82 T2-weighted (source) and 27 CM (target). Cohort 2: 23 multiphase MCE MRI exams (4 phases each; 92 acquisitions) used for style transfer training for other phases; independent testing on 20 MCE MRI exams (4 phases).
Missing information
Exact file formats, per-image resolutions, and complete train/validation splits are provided only in supplemental tables (S1–S5) and not fully enumerated in the article text.
Relationships between instances
Multiple MRI acquisitions per patient across phases (precontrast, corticomedullary, early nephrographic, nephrographic); T2-weighted and synthetic MCE images are anatomically coregistered within patient.
Noise
Examinations with substantial field inhomogeneity or motion artifacts were excluded from training after manual inspection.
External data
Some MRI examinations performed at outside institutions (cohort 1) met minimum technical requirements.
Confidentiality
Retrospective HIPAA-compliant imaging study; IRB-approved; consent waived.
Re-identification
Not discussed; typical institutional workflows imply de-identified data for research use.
Sensitive data
Clinical imaging of patients with renal masses.